[ZAL-TR-2026-02]January 2026

Exact Causal DAG Surgeries and Counterfactual Pearlian Bounds for Synthetic Anomaly Attribution

Isolating Generative Latent Inpainting via do-Calculus and Structural Causal Models

Causal Explainability EngineerStatistical Rigor EngineerDomain Signal Processing Engineer
Formal Abstract

Addressing the confounding bias introduced by foundation model priors in deepfake detection, we construct a Pearlian Structural Causal Model (SCM). By executing do-calculus graph surgery, we isolate the direct causal effect of generative latent perturbations against physical sensor noise (PRNU, ELA, and rPPG), establishing defensible counterfactual attribution bounds.

Live Interventional Simulation: Causal DAG Surgery
Pearlian SCM Graph Surgery Simulator

Demonstrating do-calculus intervention and counterfactual isolation of generative artifacts.

U_genX_editS_prnuS_elaS_bioY_verdict
Pearlian Causal State
Intervention Mode:observational
Forensic Anomaly Posterior:74.0%
Average Treatment Effect (ATE):0.000
Confounding Bias:0.320
Selected DAG Node

Click any node in the causal diagram to inspect structural equation parameters.

1. Confounding in Generative Detection

Observed correlations between generative artifacts and image anomalies are frequently confounded by latent generative seeds, compression codecs, and camera sensor post-processing. A naive conditional probability P(Y | X) misattributes platform compression to synthetic manipulation.

By modeling the media genesis process as a directed acyclic graph (DAG), we explicitly separate synthetic inpainting interventions do(I = 1) from platform quantization noise.

2. Identifiability of Counterfactual Attribution

We state the structural equation model for the forensic sensor manifold. Applying Pearl’s back-door criterion, we identify the causal effect of generative synthesis on discrete frequency residuals.

Theorem 2 (Counterfactual Invariant Uniqueness)

Under non-parametric structural equation models with additive physical camera noise, the interventional distribution P(Y | do(X=x)) is uniquely identifiable from the observed joint distribution P(X, Y, Z) and verified PRNU calibration sets.

3. Judicial Admissibility Standards

Counterfactual isolation provides verifiable causal explanations that satisfy Daubert/Frye admissibility requirements, providing courts with definitive mathematical proofs of intervention rather than opaque confidence percentages.

BibTeX Citation
@article{zal2026causal,
  title={Exact Causal DAG Surgeries and Counterfactual Pearlian Bounds for Synthetic Anomaly Attribution},
  author={Zal Logic Research Team},
  journal={Zal Logic Technical Reports},
  volume={2},
  pages={1--18},
  year={2026},
  publisher={Zal Logic Inc.}
}